1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).
Thread Rating:
- 0 Votes - 0 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
|
Author |
Message |
jvkohl
Expert
Joined:
Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts:
511
|
The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
10-07-2009 11:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2009 11:22 AM by jvkohl.)
|
|
10-07-2009 11:21 AM
|
|
jvkohl
Expert
Joined:
Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts:
511
|
RE: The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
10-08-2009 6:38 PM
There are parallels between the olfactory system and immune system. Both detect self/non-self differences in genetic make-up that people commonly refer to as "tissue type." Non-olfactory sensory input from the social environment cannot convey the same type of message; we can't see differences in tissue type. This means that no matter how often we are told that humans are primarily visual creatures, we cannot be. Our response to visual input must be conditioned by its pairing with olfactory input. A recent article on congenital blindness helps to detail this.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1955...d_RVDocSum
or see the media representation:
https://spectrum.mit.edu/issue/2009-fall...y-of-mind/
"In a study comparing congenitally blind adults to their sighted counterparts, Saxe instead found that the theory-of-mind mechanisms in these subjects was "indistinguishable. The social brain network evolves perfectly fine in the absence of vision."
(10-08-2009 4:51 PM)renny Wrote: ... the average person would never see a diagram detailing the inner working of the nose.
...It's surely as complicated and unique as telling red from square or the sound of a bad muffler from the rustle of leaves.
|
|
10-08-2009 6:38 PM
|
|
Share This Thread