Hello There, Guest! Register


Login or Register to remove all advertising

   
1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
Author Message
jvkohl
Offline
Expert




Joined: Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts: 511


Post: #1
The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
10-07-2009 11:21 AM

https://www.frontiersin.org/neuroanatomy.../022.2009/

--More about the problems with product promotion when the "pheromones" are marketed as effecting the non-functional human VNO.

[FONT=Arial][/FONT]James V. Kohl
http://www.pheromones.com
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2009 11:22 AM by jvkohl.)
10-07-2009 11:21 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
renny
Offline
Serious Poster




Joined: Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts: 835

Reputation: 8119
Rep Post

Post: #2
RE: The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
10-08-2009 4:51 PM

Ya know, when we go to get glasses or get a hearing test we see those charts on the wall detailing all the little parts of the eye or ear. It ocurs to me that unless we have serious problems with our sense of smell or perhaps taste, the average person would never see a diagram detailing the inner working of the nose. Sinuses maybe if we have problems there, the structure of the nose if we consider cosmetic surgery or have an injury, but never how the nose actually smells things. It's surely as complicated and unique as telling red from square or the sound of a bad muffler from the rustle of leaves.

The Androstenone Discussion
10-08-2009 4:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jvkohl
Offline
Expert




Joined: Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts: 511


Post: #3
RE: The risk of extrapolation in neuroanatomy
10-08-2009 6:38 PM

There are parallels between the olfactory system and immune system. Both detect self/non-self differences in genetic make-up that people commonly refer to as "tissue type." Non-olfactory sensory input from the social environment cannot convey the same type of message; we can't see differences in tissue type. This means that no matter how often we are told that humans are primarily visual creatures, we cannot be. Our response to visual input must be conditioned by its pairing with olfactory input. A recent article on congenital blindness helps to detail this.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1955...d_RVDocSum

or see the media representation:
https://spectrum.mit.edu/issue/2009-fall...y-of-mind/
"In a study comparing congenitally blind adults to their sighted counterparts, Saxe instead found that the theory-of-mind mechanisms in these subjects was "indistinguishable. The social brain network evolves perfectly fine in the absence of vision."

(10-08-2009 4:51 PM)renny Wrote:  ... the average person would never see a diagram detailing the inner working of the nose.
...It's surely as complicated and unique as telling red from square or the sound of a bad muffler from the rustle of leaves.
10-08-2009 6:38 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Share This Thread
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:

Login or Register to remove all advertising

  

Current time: 03-21-2023, 11:44 AM
Contact Us Home Return to Content Lite (Archive) Mode RSS Syndication Forum Disclaimer