1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).
Indigo Mind Labs Alpha Male 6 review?
|
Author |
Message |
Maverick
Checking out the place
Joined:
Jun 2018
Sex:
Posts:
14
Reputation: 96
Rep Post
|
RE: Indigo Mind Labs Alpha Male 6 review?
01-10-2020 9:45 AM
(10-01-2019 5:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: We have this thing called technology generations. It's something I invented. It's where every so often, we use a newly developed technology set. Each generation of technology is more powerful than the last, and each one has different usage requirements. To get results with subs up to 5G, you had to use them a lot. Before I showed up, nobody even knew that you had to use subs more than an hour a day to get results.
Now we have a lot of programs that need 5 hours or less per day of use. I also invented "Instant on" subs, which kick in within about 10 minutes in most cases, and we have them, too. Awakener, sleep aid, that sort of thing.
If I thought I knew everything, why would I still be developing these technologies after 26 years of doing it? Why would I have a public forum where people make reports about when it doesn't work? Why would I be crowdsourcing ideas for what to put in my programs?
I don't call myself a scientist in the way you're thinking. My professional title isn't "scientist". But I am the one who took subliminals from 1970's and 1980's era tech to what I and a very few other producers are building now. I discovered and invetnted almost everything in between, and I did so using my own experiments, research and developments. I used the scientific method to do that. To the best of my ability, and the resources available, I used - and still use - science. And as I gain in wealth, I will be doing even more science: we are planning clinical trials in the future.
So I'm not a scientist in the same way a geologist is, or an astrophysicist. But I use science to achieve my results. And in that sense, I am a practitioner of science - also known as a scientist.
(06-08-2019 12:38 PM)Maverick Wrote: you were bound to eventually. had it happeneded during DMSI you would have credited shannon. This is just post hoc reasoning. I could sell water as phermones* and eventually some people would get with a woman through co incidence. then they would credit me. they would succeed enough time to give me a list of happy clients who would then be afraid not to buy from me. Even if i refunded the failures the successes by coincidence would keep me in business
*and maybe I will
You are wrong. People notice when "subliminals" don't work. We did experiments with that - placebo effect, at best, only lasts a week or two. Most people don't even get placebo when you give them a "subliminal recording" that is inert. Only real subliminals get real results. Especially when they're as expensive as mine are.
"You are wrong." just your opinion.in my scientific opinion i am right
"I don't call myself a scientist in the way you're thinking" how do you know what i am thinking. idiot. You are a scientist but not a scientist lol. There its just your inflated opinion of you
"I am the one who took subliminals from 1970's and 1980's era tech to what I and a very few other producers are building now. I discovered and invetnted almost everything in between, and I did so using my own experiments, research and developments. I used the scientific method to do that" c
so where is your evidence? i could make that claim. without scientific evidence any claims to science are nonsense. A scientist who believes in LOA? LOL
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2020 9:50 AM by Maverick.)
|
|
01-10-2020 9:45 AM
|
|
Share This Thread