Hello There, Guest! Register


Login or Register to remove all advertising



1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not civetol?
Author Message
GoergeFocky
Offline
Contributes Regularly




Joined: Mar 2013
Sex: Male
Posts: 466

Reputation: 233
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 146
Thanks received:
532 thanks in 245 posts



Post: #21
RE: Why not civetol?
10-26-2016 9:04 AM

(10-26-2016 8:38 AM)wiserd Wrote:  What do you mean when you say pheromone receptor? I'm not a fan of using VNO activation as a proxy for pheromonal activity, but androstenone activates the VNO.

No, not the VNO.
http://aktuell.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/pm2015...49.html.en

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...1915002116
10-26-2016 9:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by Androcles
Login or register to remove all advertising

wiserd
Offline
I'm so meta, even this acronym




Joined: Nov 2011
Sex: Male
Posts: 1,509

Reputation: 1495
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 1629
Thanks received:
1434 thanks in 735 posts



Post: #22
RE: Why not civetol?
10-29-2016 2:15 AM

(10-26-2016 9:04 AM)GoergeFocky Wrote:  No, not the VNO.
http://aktuell.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/pm2015...49.html.en

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...1915002116


Ah, VNR receptors located in the nasal epithelium, not the VNR.

[Image: Example.jpg]
10-29-2016 2:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Share This Thread
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:

Current time: 08-16-2017, 7:11 AM
Contact Us Home Return to Content Lite (Archive) Mode RSS Syndication Forum Disclaimer