Hello There, Guest! Register

Or login with facebook connect Facebook, or Windows Live

Login or Register to remove all advertising



1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Paradox's review of Erox
Author Message
crowdgather
Offline
Vendor




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex: Male
Posts: 106


Thanks Given: 22
Thanks received:
190 thanks in 57 posts



Post: #11
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 12:55 PM

I appreciate your views and I am learning from all of your opinions.
09-10-2011 12:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
as33156
Offline
Ubermensch




Joined: Jul 2011
Sex: Often Please
Posts: 4,121

Reputation: 2808
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 11153
Thanks received:
7589 thanks in 2575 posts



Post: #12
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 1:53 PM

I don't know about 8 to 12 hours to build rapport/comfort with a girl. That's a long time. I could do that without mones in way less time. It takes Androstadienone only 15 minutes max at 30mcg & up to build comfort I find.

My Journal: http://pherotruth.com/Thread-Nice-guy-to...My-journey

My Survival Course & Thread (GET IT & THRIVE): http://pherotruth.com/Thread-The-Modern-...#pid108462

"He who can take advice is sometimes superior to those who give it." Albanian Proverb..... Stay Congruent My Friends
09-10-2011 1:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pagodeiro
Offline
Mones changed my life




Joined: Jan 2010
Sex: Male
Posts: 1,978

Reputation: 1912
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 1098
Thanks received:
2466 thanks in 1005 posts



Post: #13
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:15 PM

I've noticed that EDG ( Eau de Geek ) is more kinda daytime product ..

I've seen it hitting up to 5m

when overdosed .. this means over 5 sprays it had some typical repulsive Effects !

Est works like a charm on women ... there are ton's of reports out ..

Pago

Only Ladies welcome ... LadyBoys stay away !
09-10-2011 2:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by as33156, dbot, JohnnyHard, Pheroman
Login or register to remove all advertising

crowdgather
Offline
Vendor




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex: Male
Posts: 106


Thanks Given: 22
Thanks received:
190 thanks in 57 posts



Post: #14
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:19 PM

It was not my intention to start an argument with my reference to seduction lore. I was simply referring to things I have read that suggest that you need to establish comfort before you escalate to seduction. I am referring to getting your target comfortable for sex which is different than getting your target comfortable in talking to you and spending time with you. This should occur very quickly if you are attractive, your target is looking for company, or if you are using good technique or pheromones. I threw out 8 to 12 hours, but this paragraph (Mystery Method) speaks of 4 to 10:

"This means that, on a cold approach (where it's someone you meet at a coffee shop as opposed to your sister's best friend), you generally need between 4 and 10 hours of interacting with her before sex can occur. This can be over multiple days (you spend an hour with her when you first meet her, and then at least three hours with her the next day . . . that may be enough). But don't lose sight of the clock. Before 4 hours, she likely won't be "ready" and you'll run into insurmountable last-minute resistance in Seduction. After 10 hours, and it will feel awkward and creepy to her, since you didn't have the balls to make a move when you had the chance, and, anyway, by now she's gotten so used to your non-sexual presence that all of the attraction/sexual tension has dissipated. The 4-10 principle (average around 7) is crucial -- though there are exceptions, you'll be amazed at how often it applies."

My thought was simply that increasing a woman's sense of trust and comfort more rapidly could be a good thing to people who subscribe to the above techniques. I am not denying that seduction sometimes happens more rapidly, or that there are lots of variables involved.
09-10-2011 2:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by dbot, JohnnyHard
as33156
Offline
Ubermensch




Joined: Jul 2011
Sex: Often Please
Posts: 4,121

Reputation: 2808
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 11153
Thanks received:
7589 thanks in 2575 posts



Post: #15
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:19 PM

(09-10-2011 2:15 PM)Pagodeiro Wrote:  I've noticed that EDG ( Eau de Geek ) is more kinda daytime product ..

I've seen it hitting up to 5m

when overdosed .. this means over 5 sprays it had some typical repulsive Effects !

Estratetraenol works like a charm on women ... there are ton's of reports out ..

Pago

Can you please forward your dosage levels and where you got this from? I have know ideal what it is. But if it has range of 5m WOW! Androstadienone is great but doesn't have anywhere near the range I find.

My Journal: http://pherotruth.com/Thread-Nice-guy-to...My-journey

My Survival Course & Thread (GET IT & THRIVE): http://pherotruth.com/Thread-The-Modern-...#pid108462

"He who can take advice is sometimes superior to those who give it." Albanian Proverb..... Stay Congruent My Friends
09-10-2011 2:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pagodeiro
Offline
Mones changed my life




Joined: Jan 2010
Sex: Male
Posts: 1,978

Reputation: 1912
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 1098
Thanks received:
2466 thanks in 1005 posts



Post: #16
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:23 PM

(09-10-2011 2:19 PM)crowdgather Wrote:  It was not my intention to start an argument with my reference to seduction lore. I was simply referring to things I have read that suggest that you need to establish comfort before you escalate to seduction. I am referring to getting your target comfortable for sex which is different than getting your target comfortable in talking to you and spending time with you. This should occur very quickly if you are attractive, your target is looking for company, or if you are using good technique or pheromones. I threw out 8 to 12 hours, but this paragraph (Mystery Method) speaks of 4 to 10:

"This means that, on a cold approach (where it's someone you meet at a coffee shop as opposed to your sister's best friend), you generally need between 4 and 10 hours of interacting with her before sex can occur. This can be over multiple days (you spend an hour with her when you first meet her, and then at least three hours with her the next day . . . that may be enough). But don't lose sight of the clock. Before 4 hours, she likely won't be "ready" and you'll run into insurmountable last-minute resistance in Seduction. After 10 hours, and it will feel awkward and creepy to her, since you didn't have the balls to make a move when you had the chance, and, anyway, by now she's gotten so used to your non-sexual presence that all of the attraction/sexual tension has dissipated. The 4-10 principle (average around 7) is crucial -- though there are exceptions, you'll be amazed at how often it applies."

My thought was simply that increasing a woman's sense of trust and comfort more rapidly could be a good thing to people who subscribe to the above techniques. I am not denying that seduction sometimes happens more rapidly, or that there are lots of variables involved.


nothing is eaten as hot as it's cooked ... ;)

sometimes it happens faster to close the deal.. but mostly it takes a bit time !

Pago

Only Ladies welcome ... LadyBoys stay away !
09-10-2011 2:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rattlesnake
Offline
Serious Poster




Joined: Nov 2009
Sex: Often Please
Posts: 678

Reputation: 2049
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 1331
Thanks received:
773 thanks in 326 posts



Post: #17
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:31 PM

Hmm interesting to think of it as caring in the same way you'd care for a pregnant woman. Personally, I got the crush vibe. Same experience with wingman X22.

I've not used either to move towards sexual intimacy yet, but it'll be easy to see if its cock blocks or not. More testing is needed!
09-10-2011 2:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by as33156
Login or register to remove all advertising

crowdgather
Offline
Vendor




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex: Male
Posts: 106


Thanks Given: 22
Thanks received:
190 thanks in 57 posts



Post: #18
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 2:43 PM

Women barely respond to EST so your bigger worry is that men think of you as a woman Eek The EST is primarily there to assist females, but again EST and AND are just base components, but the star is ER303 which has shown an ability to increase arousal.

I wish I was single so I could see for myself, but I will just enjoy living through all of your experiences. Smoke
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2011 2:44 PM by crowdgather.)
09-10-2011 2:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paradox
Offline
Contributes Regularly




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex:
Posts: 126

Reputation: 433
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 29
Thanks received:
206 thanks in 64 posts



Post: #19
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 3:19 PM

(09-10-2011 2:43 PM)crowdgather Wrote:  Women barely respond to Estratetraenol so your bigger worry is that men think of you as a woman Eek The Estratetraenol is primarily there to assist females, but again Estratetraenol and AND are just base components, but the star is ER303 which has shown an ability to increase arousal.

I wish I was single so I could see for myself, but I will just enjoy living through all of your experiences. Smoke

This is untrue I can point you to a womans Pheromone forum where they discuss their experiences with Estratetraenol.

Crowdgather, I know you feel the need to defend your patented products. After all if there is no demand for Erox, Estratetraenol or A-1 then it would mean a loss of income.

A loss of income is something I do not want for you or your company. It could be that your product would "function" better with less Estratetraenol or with a substitute or with other pheromones added in.
09-10-2011 3:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
crowdgather
Offline
Vendor




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex: Male
Posts: 106


Thanks Given: 22
Thanks received:
190 thanks in 57 posts



Post: #20
RE: Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 5:37 PM

LOL I am not worried about income in this conversation. I am just trying to balance your opinions on the effects of EST with what I can find in the public domain. You are free to do what you like with your money and I have thanked you a few times already for sharing your feelings. If you intend to argue and bully me until I change the formula then lets agree to disagree and move on. I understand that You would prefer not to have EST in the formulation- I get it.
09-10-2011 5:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Share This Thread
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot Ask BlinkBits BlinkList Co.mments Delirious Feed Me Links Google Bookmarks Linkagogo Ma.gnolia MSN Live Netscape Netvouz Newsvine RawSugar Rojo Smarking Socializer Sphinn Spurl Squidoo Tailrank Technorati Yahoo My Web
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  My Erox review! Sensasian 1 280 12-09-2013 6:48 PM
Last Post: spamz
  Fly's Erox review Fly So Hi 4 3,669 03-23-2012 6:30 AM
Last Post: Fly So Hi

Forum Jump:


Login or Register to remove all advertising
Love Scent 468x60
Current time: 04-19-2014, 12:33 PM
Contact Us Home Return to Content Lite (Archive) Mode RSS Syndication Forum Disclaimer