Hello There, Guest! Register

Or login with facebook connect Facebook, or Windows Live

Login or Register to remove all advertising



1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Paradox's review of Erox
Author Message
Paradox
Offline
Contributes Regularly




Joined: Aug 2011
Sex:
Posts: 179

Reputation: 476
Rep Post

Thanks Given: 36
Thanks received:
262 thanks in 87 posts



Post: #1
Paradox's review of Erox
09-10-2011 7:39 AM

As many of you know I am a straight shooter when it comes to pheromone reviews. It is not my intention to upset anyone but well….I tell it like it is.

Here are my impressions of Erox: First, starting with the packaging. It's very feminine. It looks like lipstick.

I tried Erox in several locations. I have also tested it at several different strengths (2, 3, 4 and 5 sprays). The bottom line on this product is that it reminds me of MX297.

To give a little background, when MX297 first came out many posters reviewed it as sexual in nature. I was one of the few posters who revealed it to be non sexual.

The self effects of Erox are nice. It puts you in an upbeat mood.

The fragrance is nice it had a grapefruit and watermelon type of fragrance to it. It's not too strong.

I've received various reactions from this mix including hair flips, fast head turning and a few women following the sillage to see where the scent is coming from. The last reaction is probably the most prevalent.

The Estratetraenol does counteract the effects of the Androstadienone. However, here is the problem with Erox and it's a big one. Estratetraenol is a derivative of the sex hormone estradiol. "Estratetraenol is produced naturally by child-bearing women and is not present at all in men. It has a calming effect on both men and women, and will tend to make people more amiable, solicitous and friendly around you" (http://estratetraenol.com/).

A man wearing a pregnant womans scent is not good hence the MX297 effect. Yes, Erox attracts but I believe that the Estratetraenol prevents sexual interaction. The Androstadienone and the ER303 are definitely hard at work in this formula.

There are a few other things that I observed about Erox. One was that this formula has no BANG, ZOOM, POW. Erox does not have a hard hitter at the wheel. Women will not open you with this formula. You have to do the work. They will talk to you but they will not interact sexually with a "pregnant woman".

I have also found the range to be limited. The range for this product is probably 3 feet max. Once you are in range however they will try and track down the source of the scent.

This product does give women the feeling of caring but not sexual caring. It's more like watching over the pregnant lady and making sure she is OK.

I would like to try this product out from 6-10 sprays to see if anything changes. Due to my extensive testing I am almost out of the product.

I think I know how to improve this product (PM me crowdgatherer if you are interested in finding out how). For me right now, it is too similar to MX297 to be useful.
09-10-2011 7:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Thanks given by JAYCEE, Rattlesnake, dbot, Deja Vu, Q-Tips, mengster, as33156, JohnnyHard, Antimatter, ZB pmones, Pheroman
Login or register to remove all advertising


Share This Thread
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot Ask BlinkBits BlinkList Co.mments Delirious Feed Me Links Google Bookmarks Linkagogo Ma.gnolia MSN Live Netscape Netvouz Newsvine RawSugar Rojo Smarking Socializer Sphinn Spurl Squidoo Tailrank Technorati Yahoo My Web
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011 7:39 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - JAYCEE - 09-10-2011, 8:01 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 8:13 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - dbot - 09-10-2011, 10:34 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 10:56 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Deja Vu - 09-10-2011, 11:22 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - crowdgather - 09-10-2011, 10:58 AM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 12:37 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - dbot - 09-10-2011, 12:13 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - crowdgather - 09-10-2011, 12:55 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - as33156 - 09-10-2011, 1:53 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Pagodeiro - 09-10-2011, 2:15 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - as33156 - 09-10-2011, 2:19 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Pagodeiro - 09-10-2011, 2:23 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 3:19 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 6:06 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Paradox - 09-10-2011, 6:37 PM
RE: Paradox's review of Erox - Pagodeiro - 09-10-2011, 8:30 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  My Erox review! Sensasian 1 548 12-09-2013 6:48 PM
Last Post: spamz
  Fly's Erox review Fly So Hi 4 4,696 03-23-2012 6:30 AM
Last Post: Fly So Hi

Forum Jump:


Login or Register to remove all advertising
Love Scent 468x60
Current time: 10-25-2014, 2:37 PM
Contact Us Home Return to Content Lite (Archive) Mode RSS Syndication Forum Disclaimer